Answer to the Mystery Quote

By -
Sorry to leave everyone hanging, but the answer to the mystery quote from before was Ludwig von Mises. I wasn't trying to mislead when I truthfully said that he spoke German; I actually thought you guys were kidding when you didn't know who it was.

Now if someone had helped me with my other inquiry, this delay wouldn't have happened. I would have realized you guys were posting on that thread. Don't you feel ashamed of yourselves.

Comments

  1. Anonymous12:50 PM

    Bob,

    Details! Where did Mises write that?

    Also, all you have to do is check the follow-up comments box, and you will know when someone makes a comment at a particular post. The comment will be emailed to you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bob Murphy7:15 PM

    Human Action, somewhere after Chapter 20 I believe.

    I don't want my inbox even more cluttered. I want it just like David Zetland's blog. *pout*

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more