Reynolds Not Worried About Inflation

By -
Alan Reynolds of Cato is annoyed at the hysterics over June's humongous CPI jump. I dunno, kids, I still think we could see double-digit price increases in 2009 and 2010. If I had any money lying around, I'd buy gold. As Gene would say, we have a unique opportunity here.

Comments

  1. Anonymous6:56 PM

    Bob,

    You know what is really funny is that Reynolds says "core inflation" is the number to watch. A number that Richard Nixon had then Fed chairman Arthur Burns design to fool the voters. I comment on it a bit more here.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous3:28 PM

    That fact that you have no money to invest casts doubt on the advice to buy gold. I shorted gold, silver and platinum using a fund called SPPIX. On the day my article appeared it cost $16.81 a share. By August 5, it was up 26% to $21.22.

    When I wrote that oil price were going to fall on June 6, did you wish you had speculated on rising oil prices too? Really?

    I used to charge institutional investors (mutual funds and pension funds) $5-10,000 a year for tips like that.

    You want to bet against me? It's a good thing you have nothing to bet.

    Mr. Wenzel can't read. I didn't say core inflation was the number to watch. I said "ex-energy" is the number for THE FED to watch. So did Todd Clark and the Kansas City Fed, Robert Rich and Charles Steindel and the NY Fed, and a couple of economists at the Atlanta Fed. I'll post the links at the cato.org blog, on the off chance that either of you is interested in learning about something you clearly do not understand (economics).

    Those willing to take a serious look at serious arguments and evidence often get rich. The others just write irritable blogs.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more