Can Someone Tell Me What Word Is Doing?

By -
My (old) computer was running REALLY slowly tonight -- it takes up to 10 seconds for a letter I type to appear on screen! So I ran Activity Monitor (ps). The main culprit was Firefox, which must have been stuck running some background Javascript in an infinite loop or something. But what was more surprising was that Microsoft Word was sucking up 20% of my CPU -- while not in use! Yes, it was running -- I had loaded, changed, and saved a doc in Word four hours earlier -- but I had not touched it since. So what was Word up to? Searching for extraterrestrial intelligence? Cracking al Qaeda cyphers? Any ideas?

Comments

  1. Bob Murphy12:49 AM

    I dunno but my laptop is definitely distracted by other things most of the time. With Windows Vista, how do I perform the same diagnostic you are talking about here?

    (Gene, it pains me that I will never know more than you do regarding computers. I think I can catch you just about anywhere else if I really wanted to.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah1:50 AM

    "With Windows Vista, how do I perform the same diagnostic you are talking about here?"

    1) Proceed to nearest used computer dealer.
    2) Sell Vista machine.
    3) Go to nearest Apple store.
    4) Purchase Mac.
    5) Run Activity Monitor.

    (Seriously, there is undoubtedly some inferior version of Activity Monitor on Windows, but I don't know its name.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8:35 AM

    Press CTRL+Shift+Esc.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous5:42 PM

    The Word was obviously running Lucas-Lehmer on over 10000000 digits.

    mersenne.org

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more