Who's That Guy?

By -
Twice now at FEE, I've been introduced to someone who has said to me, "I loved your book on the Great Depression."

Of course, I've written no such book, but who are they mistaking me for? Murray Rothbard? Bob Higgs? John Maynard Keynes? Any ideas?

Comments

  1. Silas Barta11:24 AM

    People think I've said stuff that I really didn't, all the freakin time. Join the club.

    (And to head off the obvious reply: Bob really did trivialize the suffering of the victims of climate change and he heroically "stands by" his remarks. Just check the link.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous2:40 PM

    Another author named Gene?

    http://www.amazon.com/Rethinking-Great-Depression-American-Ways/dp/1566634717/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1217356652&sr=8-2

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bob Murphy2:56 PM

    I am trying to think of a joke regarding your psychological condition, Gene. But nothing is sufficiently clever to post.

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah5:41 PM

    Yes, they must be thinking of Smiley.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8:28 PM

    Bob,

    This is what you are looking for:

    Bipolar Callahan FL

    http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cache:6wmsa7d-MGIJ:articles.directorym.com/Bipolar_Callahan_FL-r287-Callahan_FL.html+callahan+depression&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=10&gl=us

    ReplyDelete
  6. TokyoTom5:17 AM

    Maybe they're confusing you with that more well-known Callahan, Colleen?

    Judith McDonald, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, and Colleen Callahan. “Trade Wars: Canada’s Reaction to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff.” Journal of Economic History 57, no. 4 (1997)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more