Know Your Gnostics
My new feature article is now up in PDF form for subscribers at The American Conservative. I'm hoping it will be released in HTML for the broad public soon!
"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness
I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Did you smack down the misuse of the term?
ReplyDeleteLoved the whole article. Best in months.
ReplyDeleteThank you. Sharing with the known universe.
@galtenberg
Pestered @amconmag for an HTML version:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/know-your-gnostics/
Thanks Chris and Shalan!
ReplyDelete